Naturalism vs. realism
To start, Down by the Riverside is centered around a natural event: the flooding of the Mississippi River. The way that this represents naturalism is the way in which the flood controls the story, thus making naturalism the main focus of the story. From the beginning of the story, it can be seen how important the flood is going to be. When reading the story, the reader seems to get a sense of hopelessness, where the story is just one bad thing after another. This feeling also feeds into a main theme of naturalism: how in control nature is. In naturalism, the characters have a lot less of a say in what is happening than you might think. In naturalism, not only are the characters at the mercy of nature, but, commonly, the characters are specifically being tormented by nature. This shows in Down by the Riverside: in the story, it seems like Mann can't catch a break because of the story. First, he has to take his wife to the hospital, then he is put in situations where it requires him to kill and steal, and finally, he is put in a situation that leads to his death. This way in which the characters respond to nature is a perfect example of naturalism in a story.
In contrast, A Raisin in the Sun is a very realist story. In this story, the characters are given very specific personalities so that the story can unfold in accordance with realism. The way that realism plays out in this story is the main event of the previously poor family getting a large sum of money, and each character has to respond in accordance with their personalities. For example, Walter wants to spend the money on a liquor store, in hopes that this investment will become a sustainable job; Mama wants to spend the money on more realistic things, such as a new house and a college fund for Walter's sister. In the end, they seem to agree that most of the money will go to a house and the college fund, but the remaining money will go to Walter and his liquor store. Unfortunately, due to Walter's character, he takes the money and puts it into his liquor store, which ends up being a scam and leads to the loss of all the money. Now that the money is gone, the characters are put into new, difficult situations: should they get a refund on the house? Should they give in to white racism? Letting realism once again unfold in this story.
These are two very different stories, incorporating two different styles of storytelling: realism and naturalism. The main difference between these two stories is how much power the characters are given. In Down by the Riverside, the characters are given minimal power, and they therefore suffer from the various difficulties of the story. On the other hand, in A Raisin in the Sun, the characters are given a lot of power over their situation, which leads to an ending that is quite happy but rather optimistic. There is one thing that is very common between these two stories, and that is that they are both written to criticize racism in their own way, though they contrast in how they do it. The naturalism in Down by the Riverside gives a less optimistic outlook on racism. It uses the tragedy of the flood to represent how racism is crushing the black race, and how there doesn't seem to be a way out. The realism in A Raisin in the Sun gives a bit more of a hopeful view. The explicit use of racism as a conflict in the story, as well as the characters trying to make the best of the situation they are in, represents the idea that there can always be a way out of the situation that you are in, no matter the circumstances.
Hey Erik, I like how your post contrasts the differences between naturalism and realism. I like especially how you compare characters being at the mercy of nature in naturalism vs. characters having self determination in realism. You do a great job of using the description of these narrative styles to comment on the underlying feelings they express. Naturalism expresses a pessimistic view that black people will never be looked out for under white society, whereas realism shows a more optimistic future where even in a broken system, black people have self determination and can find their way. Good job!
ReplyDeleteHey Erik, I really enjoyed your Naturalism vs. realism post about how both stories criticize racism in different ways. It was fascinating to see how you contrasted the helplessness of characters against nature in naturalism with their power in realism. Your clear breakdown made it much easier to understand the deeper meanings behind both stories.
ReplyDelete